Avantone Active MixCubes

 

 

So… Where do I start? The Avantones first made their voyage to my house in the passive form over 2 years ago. If you do not already know what the MixCube is, they are a single driver studio monitor made for testing mixes for limited playback situations, such as boomboxes and car stereos. Their original design date back over 20 years and were highly regarded at their time, back then they were made by a company called Auratone.

auratone_dr_motte.jpg

(photo by Dr. Motte, Source Flickr CC2.0)

 

Back to the 21st century and we have the Avantone Active MixCubes, these things are simply amazing! I use them as my main monitors for computer work. So anything from listening to music, watching TV, watching movies to doing real mixes in my favorite non-linear audio and video editors. While limited in their bass response, their overall ability to create voices and sound affects with great detail and musically is overwhelming. Here is a short video of myself introducing them:

The Avantones retail at 350 dollars, which I think is a steal. I have done comparisons to my current hi-fi setup and while they are lacking in bass, I have to say they more then make up for it in musicality and tune. If one wanted to add a subwoofer I think it would be understandable, however when you read their manual it clearly states that these are limited bandwidth monitors, so do not be expecting 115db concerts to be pumping out of these little guys. That is what my Tocaro 40’s and 15″ custom Subwoofer are for anyway, so at less then a 30th the cost I am willing to take that hit when listening to my MixCubes. For more information about them, go to their website at:

http://www.avantelectronics.com

Editor Update (Please Note):  Other users have reported problems with heavy hum.  I did experience some heavy hum when using the RCA connectors, however when I switched from the RCA to the XLR input the hum was greatly reduced.  I will do further research and see if there are any solutions or updates being recommended by Avantone Electronics.

Posted by admin on April 20th, 2008

Sandy Stone Responds to Joseph Lopez’s “Hi-Fi Magazines” Article

Sandy Stone is a world renowned Professor in New Media. She has a vast background in multi-media, dating back to zines and pirate radio’s she ran out of her parents basements. She worked at Bell Labs where she was on the development teams for “core memory” and “touch tone” technologies. She also worked as a rock and roll engineer at the Record Plant, specifically working with the likes of Jimi Hendrix and other “oldie moldies” as she calls them. She also owned her own stereo shop and worked with many “innovators” in the 70’s and 80’s.

She currently resides at the University of Texas at Austin, in the Radio, Television and Film department were she teaches in the ACTLab. This semester along with Joseph Lopez, she is teaching a course called “sound scapes” where they will explore sound theory, sound making and the electronic playback.

The article below are her remarks to the article by Joseph Lopez about hi-fi history:

____________________________________

That’s very nice work, very informative and useful.

I don’t know if this is useful, but Advent was actually a late development. Ed Villchur invented the acoustic suspension loudspeaker when he was a researcher at the American Foundation for the Blind in New York City. AFB wasn’t interested (they explained all this to me when I accidentally reinvented the thing for them years later for the same research purpose that Ed originally did). After Ed moved to Woodstock, he started AR with Henry Kloss, because Kloss had been his student and showed promise. After a while Ed bought Kloss out because they couldn’t work together; Kloss was a strong personality who kept wanting to run the whole show. Kloss then formed KLH with Malcolm Low and Tony Hoffman, who at the time were also AR employees. Eventually they sold the KLH name and Kloss, who was really driven to be a mogul, somehow managed to avoid noncompetition problems and went on to start Advent, which made essentially the same speakers as KLH, which were essentially the same old AR3. Ed held the patent, but he tended to be easygoing. And eventually Kloss sold Advent for much the same reasons of incompatibility and moved on to Cambridge Soundworks, where he’s managed to keep it together so far.

AR made its turntable much later, after it had a solid reputation as a speaker manufacturer and in fact was shipping something like 35% of all high quality speakers manufactured in the 50s and 60s. Ed patterned his turntable on the Components Corporation turntable, which was designed by Jerry Minter at his company in Denville, New Jersey, and also on Paul Weathers’ turntable. The two couldn’t have been further apart in concept: Jerry’s was a huge cast-iron slab that weighed close to 30 pounds and was driven by a beefy synchronous motor and a special belt that stretched in only one direction. Its prototype was a 24″ monster that weighted 80 pounds and was driven by an old Ampex capstan motor bolted into its own floor stand four feet away. Its thrust bearing was a glass marble, though Jerry claimed he eventually switched to an industrial diamond. (See my note below.) Paul’s turntable was an ultralight stamped platter driven directly at the rim by a clock motor via a soft, floppy toothless rubber gear. It weighed practically nothing, and with a properly balanced Weathers tonearm you could actually pick the whole thing up and turn it upside down while it was playing a disc and it would keep right on playing. The platter, motor, and tonearm mount were attached to a metal Y-frame that floated on springs within the case. Ed wanted the silence and stability of the Minter design together with the lightness and portability of the Weathers design, so he took the suspended Y-frame and the clock motor and combined it with a drastically lightened cast iron platter to create the AR turntable.

Anyway, never mind that. I just want to mention that virtually none of that stuff happened in isolation. All the players knew each other and were riffing off each other and being jealous or admiring of each other in one way or another. Again, Sol Marantz learned from Avery Fisher, who was selling his stuff mounted in polished wood consoles that blended in with conservative living room furniture, and they both knew Rudy Bozak, who hated the idea of acoustic suspension, and in turn that larger group admired Ed Hafler’s Dynakit amplifier, which was the first affordable amplifier to use the Williamson Ultra Linear design output transformer. and all of them liked to swap tall tales with Paul Klipsch, who, with his pointy cowboy boots and Resistol hat, was likely the most eclectic character of them all. It was a big, sprawling conversation.

(My Note Below: Jerry’s motivation for the 80-pound turntable was that he’d designed a recording lathe that used a hydraulic piston in place of the leadscrew, because he wanted to get rid of the random low-frequency noise introduced by the leadscrew. He was experimenting with records having pitch in excess of 600-800 LPI with the eventual idea of producing 12″ vinyl records that could play for 24 hours at 8 RPM. This meshed very well with work going on at the American Foundation for the Blind, which was being funded by the U.S. government to develop talking books that could be mailed more cheaply, since the government picked up the postage bill for recordings mailed to or from the blind or vision-impaired. (In fact, we had a prototype disc that worked at 4 RPM with reasonable intelligibility, and could save a ton of money in postage, but we were having trouble designing a cheap turntable to play it.) Jerry’s behemoth could keep random low frequency noise well below one microinch. You could see the sound of traffic on the street outside, via the earth and the concrete foundation of the building, in the oscillographs of the groove noise. Don’t get me started.)

Posted by admin on March 15th, 2008

Eazy DIY

So a friend of mine recently showed interest in making a DIY amplifier. I told him that they were fairly common and he should be able to find a kit on the internet. I did not give him much guidance other then that. I figured he would look around and then lose interest because from my own experience, it is fun to look, but when it comes down to finding a kit, ordering it and putting it together I usually mess up at some point. I either have no time or I lose interest after finding out that there is one part of the kit that is very hard to obtain.

So when I saw my friend the other day and he told me not only that he had found an amp, but that he wanted me to build it with him, I was caught off guard. I acted like I had naturally expected him to find a project, even though I hadn’t. He pointed me to chipamp.com, a website that sells amplifier kits based off of the 47 Labs Gain Card (on the net the lingo for these cards is “gainclone”). They had a dual mono amplifier kit we thought was reasonably priced, so we purchased it ($97 dollars, which we would later figure out did not include any connectors or transformers).

We figured we could each build a channel and when our powers combine, BAM Stereo! So I ordered the kit and and then we started reading up on the net about construction, which was fairly straight forward, however we kept wondering about this “transformer” they were referring to because we quickly discovered it was not included. So we went on a search for one, I put my trusty electrical engineering friend Mark on the job and he quickly helped us figure out which one we needed. I also went to partsepxress.com and ordered RCA connectors, binding posts and IEC power connectors.

We began constructing the amps during my office hours which has served as a great space, it has a lot of light, space and my students learned about electronics at the same time that I did by watching.

So then I really got going on the project and decided to set some time aside to work on it at home. I ended up having my friend Mark help me figure out the wiring for the power supply. How he helped me was pretty over the top. We set up a system where we would talk about the wiring over IM, I would then take pictures for him to double check my wiring, post them on a server and repeat as needed. It worked surprisingly well. Here are some of the pictures I took:

 

I then hooked everything up and ran a test, which I video taped. Here is the video:

I was very surprised that it powered up and ran well. I am kind of worried about how much heat the chip should be putting out, but other then that I am pretty confident I will figure something out (probably a passive heatsink). I now have a zillion ideas of what I could use the amp for, however my favorite one so far is making a self contained single driver/powered loudspeaker system that I can use with my computer or iPod, kind of like an old school radio, Pal or Tivoli.

I would like to thank everyone who helped me along the way and most of all Brandon my friend who got me to take the dive and go DIY. It has been fun, a great “get away” and helped me get a tighter grip on how power supplies work.

Update: The day after writing this article I built an ad-hoc case out of two computer power supplies and used a computer heatsink as the passive cooler for the chip. The result is an amp that looks like it belongs in a weird science lab, I even added some duct tape as a nice finishing touch. Here is a pic:

Posted by admin on February 14th, 2008